Bonds To Reverse Soon As Yields Approach 'Line In The Sand'? | Michael Lebowitz
Adam Taggart | Thoughtful Money® Sep 10, 2026 56:23
Summary
Lebowitz sees 5% on the 10-year Treasury as a 'line in the sand' that will force the Treasury, Fed, and institutional buyers to intervene.
Narratives around Iran, tariffs, deficits, and AI debt are pushing yields higher, but trimmed mean PCE at 2.3% shows fundamentals do not justify the move.
Fed chair Warsh's hawkish Jackson Hole pivot may be 'jawboning' to establish credibility before potential cuts into 2027.
RIA is watching for technical reversal signals before extending bond duration, with three-to-five-year maturities the likely sweet spot.
Trailing 10-year bond returns bottomed and CAPE near 41 argues for locking in higher yields, especially for retirees.
Adam Taggart's takeaways
- Top takeaway Frames the central question of the discussion: whether 10-year Treasury yields approaching 5% represent a 'line in the sand' that should prompt investors to begin adding bond duration
- Argues that retirees and near-retirees should re-examine their equity exposure and consider increasing bond allocations now to lock in current higher yields before year-end
Michael Lebowitz's takeaways
- Top takeaway The guest argues 10-year bond yields at 5% are a 'line in the sand' and likely the maximum near-term upside, with secular lower yields expected over the next couple of years as yields trend toward the real growth rate
- Distinguishes bond fundamentals from narratives, noting that Core CPI at 2.5%, trimmed mean PCE at 2.3%, and break-even inflation expectations at 2.5% remain near pre-war levels and do not justify current yields, while narratives around the Iran war, tariffs, deficits, and AI-driven debt issuance are driving the disconnect
- Argues institutional buyers such as insurance companies, pension funds, and endowments will step in to buy at the 5% level before the Fed intervenes, calling the 'market put' more powerful than any 'central planner put'
- Frames buying 5% intermediate-maturity bonds today as a 'free option' — worst case, hold to maturity for steady 5% income; best case, sell at a profit if yields fall and reinvest in stocks or other assets
- Says RIA is waiting for technical signs of a trend reversal and additional inflation prints before adding duration to portfolios, preferring to buy with more confidence at lower yields than to catch a falling knife
Darius Dale's takeaways
- Top takeaway His default expectation, shared in a prior conversation with the host, was that Warsh would hike a quarter point at the upcoming Fed meeting and possibly again in the fall to establish hawkish credibility before cutting in 2027
Kevin Warsh's takeaways
- Top takeaway Took a hawkish pivot at the recent Jackson Hole speech, citing inflation concerns despite two prior soft CPI prints (–0.4% and +0.1–0.2%) and a weakening labor market with the most recent month showing –23,000 jobs
- Has previously stressed trimmed-mean measures (Dallas Fed mean trimmed at 2.28%, stable for 4–5 months) and dismissed headline PCE and CPI as 'rough swag' in his Senate testimony
- The guest reads his recent hawkish comments as 'talking the talk' — establishing credibility and setting up rate cuts in 2027 — rather than a genuine signal of policy hikes, with political pressure before the midterms a complicating factor
- His Jackson Hole comments produced a flattening of the yield curve, with short-term rates rising while long-term rates held stable