Skip to main content

Navigating Bull Markets: When to Buy In - And When To Sell Off | Grant Williams

VRIC Media Jul 6, 2026

Summary

Gold's pullback from $5,500 looks like a return to trend, not a bear market, argues guest Grant Williams.

He says broad attention to a metal's price is a signal to trim and hold dry powder - cash kept to buy weakness.

Mining equities sit below the metals, but he warns they carry far more operational risk than buying metal itself.

He argues real interest rates are the key driver of gold, and any thesis built on lower rates is already in trouble.

Silver remains his currency-debasement hedge at a low cost basis, held regardless of the round trip from $120 to $60.

Grant Williams's takeaways

  • Top takeaway His top point: decide why you own precious metals before you react to the price. Bought to protect purchasing power, the pullback from roughly $5,500 to $4,000 an ounce as of mid-2026 is a return toward trend; bought on momentum and expecting $7,500, he says you should already have sold.
  • He argues the metals are not in a bear market, just correcting from a move far ahead of trend — gold took about 6,000 years to clear $3,000, and $4,000 was written off as a gold-bug fantasy for the previous 25 years.
  • His sell signal is attention, not price: when precious metals become the story everywhere and everyone asks whether to buy, he treats that as the moment to lighten up and hold dry powder, and he counts himself among investors willing to leave the last 20% of a bubble on the table.
  • On mining equities he says price is the outcome, not the input, citing John Burback's line that price is a liar — you must weed out companies that are not a safe home for your capital, and he notes many producers now generate large free cash flow with lower leverage and good management, which makes quality names after a selloff the easiest buys.
  • His macro view: US debt and deficits are unmanageable and must resolve through a growth miracle, which he thinks unlikely, or a controlled inflate-away; he still sees an upside bias for equities on abundant liquidity and the expectation that central banks step in, while watching real rates as the key gold driver and warning the Fed cannot cut rates to service $1.3 trillion of annual interest without unleashing inflation.

Kevin Warsh's takeaways

  • Top takeaway The host reports that Warsh has said the Fed is ready to fight inflation if it has to, raising the question of whether rates fall or rise as bond yields creep up alongside gold weakness.
  • The guest reads Warsh's more hawkish-than-expected stance — about six weeks into the role as of mid-2026, against expectations that a Trump appointee would toe the line on lower rates — as a signal that policy may not go the way most investors expect, and warns that any thesis dependent on lower rates now carries risk.

Darrell Thomas's takeaways

  • Top takeaway He frames the interview around perspective, opening by asking whether the metals are not doing too well and pushing the idea that investors let a price colour their view of a market.
  • He says trimming is a skill he is still learning, describing how Rule would start selling when a market got ahead of itself and the price would then crash — first in uranium, then in gold and silver, including an interview the previous September in which Rule said both metals were running ahead of themselves and he was selling.
  • He notes that mining equities have fallen further than the metals themselves and asks how the guest finds the courage to buy high-quality names at those levels.
  • He recommends Marks' Oaktree letters as must-read and points to a recent piece contrasting a trader who bought at $24, $33 and $42 and sold each time for about $10 of scalps with an investor who bought at $20 and held to $40, which he reads as a lesson in mindset.
  • He tells a cautionary story about a Facebook contact who posted a screenshot of roughly 20% gains on SpaceX stock after listing, which he uses to argue that buyers in the post-IPO frenzy are the ones left underwater.

Rick Rule's takeaways

  • Top takeaway The guest says Rule was selling gold and silver at the highs, to gasps from people who expected him to be permanently bullish, because that level had gone too far too fast in the short term and had to correct.
  • He credits the ability to read an over-extended market to experience, notably to Rule not having sold during earlier manias when he was younger, and says a long-term holder like Rule still does not liquidate — he trims off the top to leave himself room to buy back.
  • He offers Rule as the model for selling a bubble top, counting himself among those happy to leave the last 20% of the AI bubble on the table for other people because he expects it to come down significantly.
  • On silver he says he took no profit at $120 because he listened to Rule, and that he might trim the same way only if he had the time to sit and watch for a re-entry point — trimming, not liquidating.

Howard Marks's takeaways

  • Top takeaway The guest urges listeners to read Marks' Oaktree Capital letters, which he describes as must-read, noting that Marks runs Oaktree and posts his letters periodically.
  • The host summarises a recent Marks piece contrasting a trader who bought at $24, sold at $25, bought at $33, sold at $35, then bought at $42 and sold at $46 for about $10 of scalps, with an investor who bought at $20 and held to $40.